The directors of the Miss California USA pageant, who met early Tuesday to determine whether Carrie Prejean violated her contract by working with a national group opposed to gay marriage and by posing semi-nude when she was a teenage model, have yet to decide if Prejean should be stripped of her crown.
Pageant spokesman Roger Neal told Usmagazine.com that pageant directors Keith Lewis and Shanna Moakler have been in closed-door meetings all day regarding this issue.
Neal said Tuesday that Prejean had run afoul of several parts of the 12-page contract that all prospective contestants were required to sign before competing in the November state contest.
Sadly, I know if this broad is stripped of her title, she will just hit the conservative talk show and lecturing circuit, spouting off her views on gay marriage. Because of that, we would have to deal with her mug in our faces for an extended period of time, which would probably drive me bananas.
Entries (RSS)
May 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
I think it’s kind of sad that her title would be revoke because of boobs, rather than the fact that she’s a total asshole.
May 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
*revoked.
May 6th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
another beacon of morality speaking out against gay marriage….as Alyk would say what an A-hole
May 6th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
She has the same views on gay marriage as Obama - where’s the posts and comments calling him an asshole for his view?
May 7th, 2009 at 11:21 am
Not only does Obama have the same views on gay marriage as she does, he also has topless photos floating around the net that aren’t nearly as flattering, though he has a bigger rack.
May 11th, 2009 at 8:17 pm
i keep trying to read a story about reese witherspoon and this mess keeps coming up.
what gives…